Troester v. Starbucks Corporation Briefs and Links
Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, S234969 (on grant of request to decide issue)
Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The question presented is: Does the federal Fair Labor Standard Act's de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946) and Lindow v. United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir. 1984), apply to claims for unpaid wages under California Labor Code sections 510, 1194, and 1197?
BRIEFS ON THE MERITS
Opening Brief on the Merits (filed Nov. 2, 2016)
Answering Brief on the Merits (filed Jan. 25, 2017)
Reply Brief on the Merits (filed Mar. 17, 2017)
RESPONSES TO AMICUS BRIEFS