Troester v. Starbucks Corporation Briefs and Links

Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, S234969 (on grant of request to decide issue)

 

ISSUE

Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The question presented is: Does the federal Fair Labor Standard Act's de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946) and Lindow v. United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir. 1984), apply to claims for unpaid wages under California Labor Code sections 510, 1194, and 1197?

 

BRIEFS ON THE MERITS

Opening Brief on the Merits (filed Nov. 2, 2016)

Answering Brief on the Merits (filed Jan. 25, 2017)

Reply Brief on the Merits (filed Mar. 17, 2017)

 

amicus briefs

Brief of Southern California Defense Counsel

Brief of Women's Employment Rights Clinic of Golden Gate University School of Law, Bet Tzedek, Centro Legal de la Raza

Brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America

Brief of the California Retailers Association

Brief of Employers Group and California Employment Law Council

Brief of Consumer Attorneys of California

 

RESPONSES TO AMICUS BRIEFS

Petitioner's Consolidated Answering Brief in  Reply to Amicus Briefs

Respondent's Consolidated Answering Brief in Reply to Amicus Briefs

 

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ARCHIVE OF BRIEFS

Official Supreme Court page with links to all briefs