Troester v. Starbucks Corporation Briefs and Links(with final opinion)
Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, S234969 (on grant of request to decide issue)
ISSUE
Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The question presented is: Does the federal Fair Labor Standard Act's de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946) and Lindow v. United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1063 (9th Cir. 1984), apply to claims for unpaid wages under California Labor Code sections 510, 1194, and 1197?
BRIEFS ON THE MERITS
Opening Brief on the Merits (filed Nov. 2, 2016)
Answering Brief on the Merits (filed Jan. 25, 2017)
Reply Brief on the Merits (filed Mar. 17, 2017)
amicus briefs
Brief of Southern California Defense Counsel
Brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Brief of the California Retailers Association
Brief of Employers Group and California Employment Law Council
Brief of Consumer Attorneys of California
RESPONSES TO AMICUS BRIEFS
Petitioner's Consolidated Answering Brief in Reply to Amicus Briefs
Respondent's Consolidated Answering Brief in Reply to Amicus Briefs
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ARCHIVE OF BRIEFS
Official Supreme Court page with links to all briefs
