• The Complex Litigator Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • CLASS RE-ACTION PODCAST
  • MCLE
Menu

The Complex Litigator

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
a California-centric collection of comments and resources about complex litigation and class action practice

The Complex Litigator

  • The Complex Litigator Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • CLASS RE-ACTION PODCAST
  • MCLE

Episode 19: And The Crowd Goes Wild!

August 12, 2018 H. Scott Leviant

Episode 19: And The Crowd Goes Wild!

The Episode 19 guest is David Carpenter. Hosts are H. Scott Leviant and Linh Hua.  Show topics include Troester v. Starbucks Corporation. This episode is published by The Complex Litigator.

Editor and site author H. Scott Leviant can be found on Google+, Twitter and LinkedIn, among other places.

In Podcast Episode Tags Podcast Episode, Troester v. Starbucks
Episode 18: Don't Leave in an Epic Huff →
Subscribe to The Complex Litigator RSS feed.

Troester v. Starbucks Corporation Briefs/Links (with Opinion Link)

The Complex Litigator Home
In Melendez v. S.F. Baseball Associates LLC, the California Supreme Court provides a good review of LMRA premption
about an hour ago
FAA section 1 held to exempt some California truck drivers from FAA coverage in Nieto v. Fresno Beverage Co.
about a month ago
Perfunctory certification order reversed and sent back to the trial court in Myers v. Raley's
about a month ago
No tolling for the wicked, at least when it comes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) petitions
about a month ago
In Moorer v. Noble L.A. Events Inc., the Court of Appeal confirms that a PAGA plaintiff can't keep the aggrieved employee share for himself
about a month ago
A word to the (un)wise...
about a month ago
Timbs v. Indiana to be cited in PAGA cases in 3...2...1...
about 2 months ago
I'm moving to an up-and-coming employment law firm...
about 2 months ago
In Gilberg v. Cal. Check Cashing, Ninth Circuit extends Syed, holding that FCRA precludes all surplussage in background check disclosures
about 2 months ago
Petition for Review of PAGA decision denied in Huff v. Securitas Security Services USA
about 6 months ago
  • In Melendez v. S.F. Baseball Associates LLC, the California Supreme Court provides a good review of LMRA premption https://t.co/NYOoUDW3MN
    about an hour ago
  • How dare you. I watched the Twin Towers collapse live on television. I remember where I was when terrorists murders… https://t.co/RsY79xGTy4
    about a week ago
  • RT @RepMattGaetz: There are Dems in Congress who feel betrayed by @RepAdamSchiff. They trusted him when he said there was evidence of… https://t.co/IvrkKdKJz0
    about a week ago
  • RT @ChuckRossDC: EXCLUSIVE: FBI lawyer told Congress that bureau used Bruce Ohr as a contact to Christopher Steele in order to gain… https://t.co/vjj22LCccG
    about a week ago
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (5)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • October 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (6)
  • June 2018 (3)
  • May 2018 (7)
  • April 2018 (3)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • September 2017 (6)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (7)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (3)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (8)
  • January 2014 (4)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • November 2013 (3)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (6)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (4)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (6)
  • March 2013 (13)
  • February 2013 (7)
  • January 2013 (3)
  • December 2012 (7)
  • November 2012 (5)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (5)
  • May 2012 (5)
  • April 2012 (9)
  • March 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (7)
  • January 2012 (13)
  • December 2011 (2)
  • November 2011 (4)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (3)
  • August 2011 (4)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (9)
  • May 2011 (7)
  • April 2011 (19)
  • March 2011 (6)
  • February 2011 (9)
  • January 2011 (15)
  • December 2010 (16)
  • November 2010 (12)
  • October 2010 (14)
  • September 2010 (14)
  • August 2010 (18)
  • July 2010 (16)
  • June 2010 (11)
  • May 2010 (15)
  • April 2010 (25)
  • March 2010 (19)
  • February 2010 (12)
  • January 2010 (17)
  • December 2009 (11)
  • November 2009 (16)
  • October 2009 (19)
  • September 2009 (21)
  • August 2009 (16)
  • July 2009 (16)
  • June 2009 (16)
  • May 2009 (21)
  • April 2009 (13)
  • March 2009 (17)
  • February 2009 (21)
  • January 2009 (22)
  • December 2008 (14)
  • November 2008 (11)
  • October 2008 (12)
  • September 2008 (12)
  • August 2008 (19)
  • July 2008 (26)
  • June 2008 (28)
  • May 2008 (36)
  • April 2008 (30)
  • March 2008 (3)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

note: although this site contains no offers to provide legal services, is not intended as such, and is not such an offer, some jurisdictions may nevertheless assert that this site constitutes an advertisement by an attorney.  please be aware of the possibility of such a classification as you view this site.

powered by squarespace